nvidia

Vulnerability Analysis for Container Security

Rapidly identify and mitigate container security vulnerabilities with generative AI.

AI models generate responses and outputs based on complex algorithms and machine learning techniques, and those responses or outputs may be inaccurate, harmful, biased or indecent. By testing this model, you assume the risk of any harm caused by any response or output of the model. Please do not upload any confidential information or personal data unless expressly permitted. Your use is logged for security purposes.

Input

Container To Analyze:  nvcr.io/nvidia/morpheus/morpheus:23.11-runtime

GOVERNING TERMS: This trial is governed by the NVIDIA API Trial Terms of Service. The use of this model is governed by the AI Foundation Models Community License Agreement. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Meta Llama 3 Community License, Built with Meta Llama 3.

Output

Summary

Based on the provided Checklist and Findings, the CVE is not exploitable. The application code within the container does not use the PIL.ImageMath.eval function, and neither do any of its dependencies, as confirmed by Checklist Item 1. Additionally, Checklist Item 2 indicates that the application handles exceptions and input validation related to environment parameters, although it does not specifically address the vulnerability in PIL.ImageMath.eval. Checklist Item 3 is disregarded as it has an uncertain and potentially inadequate answer. Therefore, based on the definitive answers, the CVE is not exploitable.

VEX Justification

The application code and its dependencies do not use the vulnerable PIL.ImageMath.eval function, making the CVE not exploitable.

Checklist
[
  {
    "input": "Assess Usage of PIL.ImageMath.eval: Review the application code within the container to check if the PIL.ImageMath.eval function is being used. This function is the specific target of the vulnerability. Does the codebase contain the string 'PIL.ImageMath.eval'?'",
    "response": "The application code within the container does not use the PIL.ImageMath.eval function, and neither do any of its dependencies. The codebase does not contain the string 'PIL.ImageMath.eval', and there are no imports of the PIL library. Additionally, no dependencies of the application contain the string 'PIL.ImageMath.eval'. Therefore, it is unlikely that the vulnerability associated with PIL.ImageMath.eval affects the Docker container.",
    "intermediate_steps": null
  },
  {
    "input": "Evaluate Environment Parameter Handling: Does the application using PIL.ImageMath.eval process potentially untrusted input data that could include crafted environment parameters designed to exploit this vulnerability? Evaluate how the application handles exceptions and input validation related to the environment parameter.",
    "response": "The application does not use the PIL library or the PIL.ImageMath.eval function, and there is no indication that it uses any other libraries or functions that may be vulnerable to crafted environment parameters. However, the application does handle exceptions and input validation related to environment parameters by performing necessary validation checks in the constructor of each stage and raising an exception in the case of mis-configuration. This suggests that the application is designed to handle potentially untrusted input data and exceptions related to environment parameters, but it does not specifically address the vulnerability in PIL.ImageMath.eval.",
    "intermediate_steps": null
  },
  {
    "input": "Review Code Injection Mitigations: Assess the robustness of mitigations against code injection attacks within the application. Since the CVE involves improper control of code generation, are there adequate measures in place to prevent the execution of arbitrary code via the environment parameter?",
    "response": "Based on the provided context, it appears that there are no adequate measures in place to prevent the execution of arbitrary code via the environment parameter. The application's use of plugins and interaction with system resources increases the potential attack surface, and without specific security controls or mechanisms in place, such as input validation, sanitization, or encoding, the application may be vulnerable to code injection attacks. Therefore, the robustness of mitigations against code injection attacks within the application is uncertain and potentially inadequate.",
    "intermediate_steps": null
  }
]
Did you like this response?