Leading reasoning and agentic AI accuracy model for PC and edge.
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1 is a large language model (LLM) which is a derivative of Meta Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (AKA the reference model). It is a reasoning model that is post trained for reasoning, human chat preferences, and tasks, such as RAG and tool calling.
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1 is a model which offers a great tradeoff between model accuracy and efficiency. It is created from Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and offers improvements in model accuracy. The model fits on a single RTX GPU and can be used locally. The model supports a context length of 128K.
This model underwent a multi-phase post-training process to enhance both its reasoning and non-reasoning capabilities. This includes a supervised fine-tuning stage for Math, Code, Reasoning, and Tool Calling as well as multiple reinforcement learning (RL) stages using REINFORCE (RLOO) and Online Reward-aware Preference Optimization (RPO) algorithms for both chat and instruction-following. The final model checkpoint is obtained after merging the final SFT and Online RPO checkpoints.
This model is part of the Llama Nemotron Collection. You can find the other model(s) in this family here: Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1
This model is ready for commercial use.
GOVERNING TERMS: Your use of this model is governed by the NVIDIA Open Model License. Additional Information: Llama 3.1 Community License Agreement. Built with Llama.
Model Developer: NVIDIA
Model Dates: Trained between August 2024 and March 2025
Data Freshness: The pretraining data has a cutoff of 2023 per Meta Llama 3.1 8B
Developers designing AI Agent systems, chatbots, RAG systems, and other AI-powered applications. Also suitable for typical instruction-following tasks. Balance of model accuracy and compute efficiency (the model fits on a single RTX GPU and can be used locally).
3/18/2025
Architecture Type: Dense decoder-only Transformer model
Network Architecture: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1 is a general purpose reasoning and chat model intended to be used in English and coding languages. Other non-English languages (German, French, Italian, Portuguese, Hindi, Spanish, and Thai) are also supported.
1.0 (3/18/2025)
0.6
, and Top P to 0.95
for Reasoning ON modeYou can try this model out through the preview API, using this link: Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1.
Engine: Transformers
Test Hardware:
Preferred/Supported] Operating System(s): Linux
A large variety of training data was used for the post-training pipeline, including manually annotated data and synthetic data.
The data for the multi-stage post-training phases for improvements in Code, Math, and Reasoning is a compilation of SFT and RL data that supports improvements of math, code, general reasoning, and instruction following capabilities of the original Llama instruct model.
Prompts have been sourced from either public and open corpus or synthetically generated. Responses were synthetically generated by a variety of models, with some prompts containing responses for both Reasoning On and Off modes, to train the model to distinguish between two modes.
Data Collection for Training Datasets: Hybrid: Automated, Human, Synthetic
Data Labeling for Training Datasets: N/A
We used the datasets listed below to evaluate Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1.
Data Collection for Evaluation Datasets: Hybrid: Human/Synthetic
Data Labeling for Evaluation Datasets: Hybrid: Human/Synthetic/Automatic
These results contain both “Reasoning On”, and “Reasoning Off”. We recommend using temperature=0.6
, top_p=0.95
for “Reasoning On” mode, and greedy decoding for “Reasoning Off” mode. All evaluations are done with 32k sequence length. We run the benchmarks up to 16 times and average the scores to be more accurate.
NOTE: Where applicable, a Prompt Template will be provided. While completing benchmarks, please ensure that you are parsing for the correct output format as per the provided prompt in order to reproduce the benchmarks seen below.
Reasoning Mode | Score |
---|---|
Reasoning Off | 7.9 |
Reasoning On | 8.1 |
Reasoning Mode | pass@1 |
---|---|
Reasoning Off | 36.6% |
Reasoning On | 95.4% |
User Prompt Template:
"Below is a math question. I want you to reason through the steps and then give a final answer. Your final answer should be in \boxed{}.\nQuestion: {question}"
Reasoning Mode | pass@1 |
---|---|
Reasoning Off | 36.6% |
Reasoning On | 47.1% |
User Prompt Template:
"Below is a math question. I want you to reason through the steps and then give a final answer. Your final answer should be in \boxed{}.\nQuestion: {question}"
Reasoning Mode | pass@1 |
---|---|
Reasoning Off | 39.4% |
Reasoning On | 54.1% |
User Prompt Template:
"What is the correct answer to this question: {question}\nChoices:\nA. {option_A}\nB. {option_B}\nC. {option_C}\nD. {option_D}\nLet's think step by step, and put the final answer (should be a single letter A, B, C, or D) into a \boxed{}"
Reasoning Mode | Strict | Strict |
---|---|---|
Reasoning Off | 74.7% | 82.1% |
Reasoning On | 71.9% | 79.3% |
Reasoning Mode | Score |
---|---|
Reasoning Off | 63.9% |
Reasoning On | 63.6% |
User Prompt Template:
<AVAILABLE_TOOLS>{functions}</AVAILABLE_TOOLS> {user_prompt}
Reasoning Mode | pass@1 |
---|---|
Reasoning Off | 66.1% |
Reasoning On | 84.6% |
User Prompt Template:
You are an exceptionally intelligent coding assistant that consistently delivers accurate and reliable responses to user instructions. @@ Instruction Here is the given problem and test examples: {prompt} Please use the python programming language to solve this problem. Please make sure that your code includes the functions from the test samples and that the input and output formats of these functions match the test samples. Please return all completed codes in one code block. This code block should be in the following format: ```python # Your codes here ```
NVIDIA believes Trustworthy AI is a shared responsibility and we have established policies and practices to enable development for a wide array of AI applications. When downloaded or used in accordance with our terms of service, developers should work with their internal model team to ensure this model meets requirements for the relevant industry and use case and addresses unforeseen product misuse.
For more detailed information on ethical considerations for this model, please see the Model Card++ Explainability, Bias, Safety & Security, and Privacy Subcards, which you can find by clicking the ModelCard++ tab above, next to Overview.
Please report security vulnerabilities or NVIDIA AI Concerns here.